Evaluation Rubric for Student Projects

3 Rubrics (proven and tested) for evaluating student projects and presentations.

These three rubrics were designed by a team of teachers crossing many curriculum areas. They've been tested and tweaked to perfection. You can download the document and modify for your own needs.


Presentation Evaluation Rubric  (Powerpoint)


Storyboard

Layout

Content


Appropriate title, outline, and conclusion slides.

Slides progress in a logical order.

Titles and other important elements stand out on the slides.


Organizing aids (bullets, hyperlinks) used appropriately.







Presentation attractive & easy to view.


Presentation avoids clutter yet utilizes the space on the slide.

Slide transitions used appropriately.

Graphics, animations, sounds, and other multimedia used for a purpose.


Effectively summarize important info.

Spelling / Grammar used properly.

At least 8 content slides.

At least 5  images, sounds, animations, videos, etc.

Author and source info. included.

5

Extremely clear & varied plan.

Hyperlinks home, next, previous 

Extremely attractive & easy to view.
No clutter and effective transitions. Great Excellent usage of multimedia components.

Content is accurate, complete, easy to read, and free of errors.

At least 8 slides, 5 images/sounds, etc.

Information is cited.

4

Clear and varied plan.

Lacks internal hyperlinks for flow.

Pretty attractive & easy to view.
Little clutter and  good transitions.

Good usage of multimedia components.


Content is mostly accurate, complete, and  is easy to read, with only a few errors.

6 slides, 3 images/sounds, etc.

information is cited.

3

Incomplete plan. 

Illogical order of slides. 

Lack of organizational aids.

Unattractive & difficult to view.
Cluttery and ineffective transitions.

Ineffective use of multimedia.

Content is inaccurate, incomplete, or difficult to read.

4 slides, 2 images/sound.

Information not fully cited.

2

No observable plan.

Illogical flow.


Extremely attractive & easy to view.
Very Cluttered ineffective transitions. 

No use of multimedia.

Content is not accurate or complete, Difficult to read, and/or too many errors.

Information not cited.


Peer






Teacher







Publishing  Evaluation  Rubric   (Newsletter, flyer, etc.)


Organization

Layout

Content


Pages well organized & creative.


Pages include required elements


Titles and other important elements stand out on the page.


Organizing aids (frame movement, tables, etc.) used appropriately.


Presentation attractive & easy to view?


Presentation avoids clutter yet utilizes the space on the slide?

Page transitions used appropriately?

Graphics, animations, sounds, and other multimedia used for a purpose.


Content is accurate and easy to read


Effectively summarize important info.

Spelling / Grammar used properly.

5

Pages well organized & creative.

Pages include all required elements

Great use of organizational aids.


Extremely attractive & easy to view.
Effective transitions and no clutter.

Excellent usage of multimedia components.

Content is accurate, complete, easy to read, and free of errors.

Excellent summarizing of information.

No spelling/grammar errors.

4

Pages organized and creative.

Most required elements included.

Good use of organizational aids.

Pretty attractive & easy to view.
Good transitions and little clutter.

Good usage of multimedia components.


Content is accurate, complete, easy to read, and mostly free of errors.

Good summarization of information.

Very few spelling/grammar errors.

3

Many pages unorganized and lack creativity.

Missing required elements.

Inconsistent use of organizational aids.

Somewhat unattractive & awkward to view.
Ineffective transitions and/or cluttery,

Ineffective use of multimedia.

Content is often inaccurate, incomplete, not easy to read, and/or  free of errors.

Inadequate summarizing of information.

Quite a few spelling/grammar errors.

2

Project is unorganized & lacks creativity.

Most required elements missing.

Poor use of organizational aids.

Unattractive and difficult to view.

Very cluttered & ineffective transitions. 

No use of multimedia.

Content is often inaccurate, incomplete, not easy to read, and/or  free of errors.

Unsatisfactory summarizing of information.

Many spelling/grammar errors.

Peer






Teacher






Web  Page  Evaluation  Rubric


Organization

Layout

Content


Pages well designed & consistent.


Pages include required elements


Titles and other important elements stand out on the page.


Organizing aids (links, tables, etc.) used appropriately.


Presentation attractive & easy to view?


Presentation avoids clutter yet utilizes the space on the slide?

Page transitions used appropriately?

Graphics, animations, sounds, and other multimedia used for a purpose.


Content is accurate and easy to read


Effectively summarize important info.

Spelling / Grammar used properly.

5

Pages well organized & creative.

Pages include all required elements

Great use of organizational aids.


Extremely attractive & easy to view.
Effective transitions and no clutter.

Excellent usage of multimedia components.

Content is accurate, complete, easy to read, and free of errors.

Excellent summarizing of information.

No spelling/grammar errors.

4

Pages organized and consistent.

Most required elements included.

Good use of organizational aids.

Pretty attractive & easy to view.
Good transitions and little clutter.

Good usage of multimedia components.


Content is accurate, complete, easy to read, and mostly free of errors.

Good summarization of information.

Very few spelling/grammar errors.

3

Many pages unorganized and lack consistency.

Missing required elements.

Inconsistent use of organizational aids (broken links, etc.)

Somewhat unattractive & awkward to view.
Ineffective transitions and/or cluttery,

Ineffective use of multimedia.

Content is often inaccurate, incomplete, not easy to read, and/or  free of errors.

Inadequate summarizing of information.

Quite a few spelling/grammar errors.

2

Project is unorganized & lacks creativity.

Most required elements missing.

Poor use of organizational aids.

Unattractive and difficult to view.

Very cluttered & ineffective transitions. 

No use of multimedia.

Content is often inaccurate, incomplete, not easy to read, and/or  free of errors.

Unsatisfactory summarizing of information.

Many spelling/grammar errors.

Peer






Teacher




ċ
rubrix-4-ppt-html-pub.rtf
(74k)
Barry Jahn,
Nov 10, 2008, 8:36 PM